Synthetic preview

Claims Pro demo narrative for extraction, structuring and search.

Architecture/demo narrative only. This page uses synthetic contract, instruction, evidence and analogous-case examples to explain the AI flow without buyer records, legal advice, outcome prediction or public source-code download.

Architecture/demo narrative

A synthetic preview, not a live product proof.

The page shows how a Claims Pro AI review flow can be explained during qualified technical review while preserving the conservative evidence-gated public posture.

Review-ready source-package offer Claims Pro AI evaluation path eval_harness_only

Change Order & Claims Intelligence Pro

Claims Pro is presented publicly as a controlled-pilot AI review path: deterministic evidence workflow plus eval harness methodology validation for clause extraction, narrative structuring and analogous case search.

Claims Pro AI features are activated in pilot under controlled discussion and require controlled technical review. Public site does not claim production availability, production validation, live model accuracy or public production model performance without buyer-specific validation and service-mode evaluation.

Page labels

The demo boundary is explicit.

  • Synthetic preview
  • Architecture/demo narrative
  • No buyer records
  • No legal advice
  • No outcome prediction
  • No public source-code download

Synthetic preview

Synthetic workflow surface with no buyer records.

The SVG is a synthetic product preview and the narrative examples below are invented architecture/demo examples.

Demo flow

Six checkpoints in the synthetic Claims Pro AI flow.

The flow keeps AI assistance bounded to extraction, structuring and search, with human verification and deterministic fallback.

Step 01

Synthetic contract clause extraction

A synthetic contract excerpt is routed through the Claims Pro AI evaluation path for clause extraction with citation review.

  • Synthetic contract excerpt: Clause 12.4 says that restricted access to Zone A must be recorded with notice date, affected area and supporting evidence for buyer review.
  • Candidate extraction: access restriction, notice timing and evidence reference.
  • Human reviewer checks the citation against the synthetic excerpt before any buyer action.

Step 02

Synthetic change narrative structuring

A synthetic site instruction is converted into a reviewable change-event narrative without deciding entitlement, recovery or outcome.

  • Synthetic site instruction: SI-024 shifts the Level 03 access route from Gate B to Gate D for five working days while temporary works are inspected.
  • Structured narrative fields: event date, affected workface, instruction reference, potential schedule note and open reviewer question.
  • The deterministic baseline keeps evidence grouping, timeline reconstruction support and open-action tracking visible.

Step 03

Synthetic analogous case search

A synthetic analogous case summary is used for semantic search review support, not for probability of success or legal advice.

  • Synthetic analogous case summary: temporary access restriction, notice issued within the review window and evidence pack complete except programme-impact note.
  • Search output is a similarity candidate for reviewer reading, not a claim outcome prediction.
  • The reviewer decides whether the synthetic comparison is useful for diligence discussion.

Step 04

Human verification checkpoint

A reviewer validates extracted clauses, evidence mapping and narrative structure before the result is used in any buyer workflow.

  • Check the cited synthetic clause against source text.
  • Check the synthetic site instruction against the event narrative.
  • Mark reviewer action as accepted, edited, rejected or needs more evidence.

Step 05

Audit log record

The architecture/demo narrative shows what an audit record can contain where AI is enabled under controlled review.

  • prompt version: claims-clause-extract-v0.synthetic
  • model id: provider-configured-review-model
  • input hash: synthetic-input-hash-024
  • cost: tracked where provider reporting supports it
  • latency: tracked where provider reporting supports it
  • output reference: synthetic-output-ref-024
  • reviewer action where available: edited before review note

Step 06

Fallback to deterministic baseline

If the AI layer is unavailable, unapproved or not useful, Claims Pro remains reviewable through deterministic workflow logic.

  • Evidence completeness review still runs.
  • Missing-evidence signals and timeline reconstruction support remain visible.
  • Open-action tracking keeps the review path auditable without AI output.

Synthetic demo data and public boundaries

Synthetic evidence checklist

Synthetic inputs only.

This synthetic evidence checklist is invented for demo explanation and is not collected by the public site.

  • Synthetic notice reference: N-024.
  • Synthetic site diary note: access route changed for five working days.
  • Synthetic access log: Gate B restricted, Gate D used as temporary route.
  • Synthetic programme-impact note: reviewer request open.
  • Synthetic photo register placeholder: not uploaded and not collected by the public site.

Not exposed

No files, proof bundles or downloads.

  • No real contract text.
  • No live client data.
  • No eval report files.
  • No source files.
  • No public downloads.
  • No pricing.
  • No customer proof.

Not claimed

No legal, commercial or predictive outcome claim.

  • No legal advice.
  • No outcome prediction.
  • No entitlement assessment.
  • No guaranteed recovery.
  • No guaranteed ROI.
  • No validated predictive ML accuracy claim.
  • No autonomous decisions.

Deterministic baseline

The fallback path is part of the architecture.

Claims Pro remains deterministic-first. AI output can be ignored, rejected or unavailable while the baseline evidence review path remains visible.

Baseline still available

The workflow does not depend on AI.

Claims Pro controlled-pilot AI review path: deterministic-first Claims Pro with eval harness evidence for extraction, structuring and analogous case search pending controlled technical review.

  • Evidence completeness.
  • Evidence grouping.
  • Timeline reconstruction support.
  • Open-action and review-state tracking.

Related review paths

Use the demo narrative with evidence, data and technical review.

Qualified buyers can pair this synthetic walkthrough with the Claims Pro AI evidence route and buyer data requirements before requesting controlled technical review.

Request technical review Review data requirements Read AI evidence AI approach Claims Pro module

Next step

Bring the synthetic demo narrative into qualified technical review.

Send module interest, evidence questions, buyer data context and governance constraints before requesting controlled Claims Pro diligence material.

Request technical review Read AI evidence

Direct line

labs@nivorqa.com

Use email for review-pack requests, module fit questions, licensing conversations and pilot scoping.