Module comparison

Compare module routes before requesting review.

Use this page to qualify module fit, maturity route and disqualifying expectations before deeper disclosure.

Comparison summary

Five modules, two maturity routes.

Start with public status and availability group, then review buyer fit and workflow objects.

Module	Public status	Availability group	Maturity route	AI evidence status	Best-fit buyer	Recommended next step
Change Order & Claims Intelligence Pro	Review-ready source-package offer	review-ready	Eval-gated AI path, deterministic-first	eval_harness_only	Commercial construction teams reviewing change-event records before internal claim-readiness decisions.	Request qualified technical review
Project Risk Intelligence	Review-ready source-package offer	review-ready	Deterministic-first with ML upgrade path	deterministic_ml_ready	Teams reviewing cost, schedule, procurement and issue signals across project-control workflows.	Request qualified technical review
Subcontractor Cost Control & Margin Leakage	Review-ready source-package offer	review-ready	Deterministic-first with ML upgrade path	deterministic_ml_ready	Commercial teams reviewing subcontract package movement, variation exposure and budget variance.	Request qualified technical review
BOQ / Cost Intelligence	Available under proposal	proposal-stage	Proposal-stage module	roadmap_only	Buyers validating whether BOQ and cost-intelligence workflows match their data assumptions.	Discuss proposal-stage scoping
Tender Comparison & Award	Available under proposal	proposal-stage	Proposal-stage module	roadmap_only	Procurement teams validating bidder comparison and package-level evaluation workflow fit.	Discuss proposal-stage scoping

Review data requirements Prepare questionnaire AI approach Open Intelligence Layer ML readiness

Intelligence Layer

Compact comparison of deterministic logic, signals and candidate ML support.

Review-ready modules have an Intelligence Layer review path. BOQ and Tender remain proposal-stage intelligence outlines only.

Module	Deterministic core	Signal layer	ML-assisted candidate	Validation required	AI posture	Maturity
Change Order & Claims Intelligence Pro	Evidence completeness.	Evidence intelligence support.	Contract clause extraction with verifiable citation evaluation path.	Confirm whether the reviewed bundle is eval_harness_only or implementation_and_eval_present before using AI-augmented implementation language.	eval_only_ai_feature; eval_harness_only	Claims Pro controlled-pilot AI review path: deterministic-first Claims Pro with eval harness evidence for extraction, structuring and analogous case search pending controlled technical review.
Project Risk Intelligence	Deterministic risk scoring.	Cost exposure signals.	Transparent anomaly detection upgrade path.	Validate risk taxonomy, scoring assumptions, cost/schedule/procurement signals and labels.	deterministic_with_ml_upgrade_path; deterministic_ml_ready	Deterministic-first review-ready source-package offer with documented tenant-specific ML upgrade path.
Subcontractor Cost Control & Margin Leakage	Margin exposure signals.	Margin leakage signals.	Anomaly detection candidate.	Validate package identity, budget and award fields, commitment states, variation labels and exposure definitions.	deterministic_with_ml_upgrade_path; deterministic_ml_ready	Deterministic-first review-ready source-package offer with documented tenant-specific ML upgrade path.
BOQ / Cost Intelligence	BOQ line and unit review outline.	Item structure and unit consistency signals.	Item normalization candidate.	Validate BOQ structure, unit conventions, cost categories, pricing sensitivity and ERP handoff assumptions.	proposal_stage_intelligence_outline; roadmap_only	Proposal-stage intelligence outline. Available under proposal; scoped buyer validation is required before deeper discussion.
Tender Comparison & Award	Bidder comparison matrix outline.	Offer normalization signals.	Offer normalization candidate.	Validate bidder data permissions, package scope, exclusion and qualification labels, scoring governance and approval workflow.	proposal_stage_intelligence_outline; roadmap_only	Proposal-stage intelligence outline. Available under proposal; scoped procurement validation is required before deeper discussion.

Open Intelligence Layer Model governance Review questionnaire

Review-ready source-package offers

Primary routes for qualified source-package review.

These modules can be reviewed for package fit, integration assumptions and commercial path after qualification.

3 modules

Review-ready source-package offer Eval-gated AI path, deterministic-first

Change Order & Claims Intelligence Pro

Deterministic-first change-event and claim-readiness workflows with a Claims Pro controlled-pilot AI review path for controlled technical review.

Best-fit buyer: Commercial construction teams reviewing change-event records before internal claim-readiness decisions.
Not-best-fit buyer: Buyers seeking legal advice, entitlement assessment or arbitration support.
Primary workflow: Change-event data model
Input objects: Change events; Notice records; Evidence references
Output objects: Structured change-event list; Claim readiness indicators; Evidence organization summary
Integration targets: Contract management platforms; Defects and issues management platforms; Construction ERP commercial modules
Intelligence examples: Evidence completeness.; Evidence grouping.; Evidence intelligence support.
Recommended next step: Request qualified technical review
Disqualifiers: Buyers seeking legal advice, entitlement assessment or arbitration support.; Teams expecting automatic claim validity, guaranteed recovery or legal outcome predictions.

Review module Intelligence examples Request review pack

Review-ready source-package offer Deterministic-first with ML upgrade path

Project Risk Intelligence

Auditable project risk intelligence for construction platforms, PMO teams and project-control workflows.

Best-fit buyer: Teams reviewing cost, schedule, procurement and issue signals across project-control workflows.
Not-best-fit buyer: Buyers expecting predictive ML accuracy claims or autonomous project decisions.
Primary workflow: Risk scoring assumptions
Input objects: Risk register entries; Cost exposure records; Schedule pressure indicators
Output objects: Ranked risk list; Exposure indicators; Early warning summary
Integration targets: Project controls and PMO reporting platforms; Construction ERP project modules; Risk registers and issue logs
Intelligence examples: Deterministic risk scoring.; Data completeness scoring.; Cost exposure signals.
Recommended next step: Request qualified technical review
Disqualifiers: Buyers expecting predictive ML accuracy claims or autonomous project decisions.; Teams needing public source-package access or a public demo sandbox.

Review module Intelligence examples Request review pack

Review-ready source-package offer Deterministic-first with ML upgrade path

Subcontractor Cost Control & Margin Leakage

Subcontract package tracking and margin leakage review for construction commercial teams, ERP vendors and cost-control platforms.

Best-fit buyer: Commercial teams reviewing subcontract package movement, variation exposure and budget variance.
Not-best-fit buyer: Buyers seeking accounting, payment processing, ERP replacement or marketplace functionality.
Primary workflow: Subcontract package data model
Input objects: Subcontract packages; Budget and award values; Variation records
Output objects: Subcontract package review board; Margin leakage indicators; Award-vs-budget variance summary
Integration targets: Construction ERP commercial modules; Cost management platforms; Subcontract administration workflows
Intelligence examples: Margin exposure signals.; Leakage exposure ranking.; Margin leakage signals.
Recommended next step: Request qualified technical review
Disqualifiers: Buyers seeking accounting, payment processing, ERP replacement or marketplace functionality.; Teams expecting legal claims automation or guaranteed margin improvement.

Review module Intelligence examples Request review pack

Available under proposal

Secondary routes for scoped validation only.

BOQ and Tender remain proposal-stage. Scope buyer data, workflow and integration assumptions before any deeper discussion.

2 modules

Available under proposal Proposal-stage module

BOQ / Cost Intelligence

BOQ review and cost-intelligence workflows available for scoped buyer validation and proposal discussion.

Best-fit buyer: Buyers validating whether BOQ and cost-intelligence workflows match their data assumptions.
Not-best-fit buyer: Buyers expecting a complete public source-package offer before scoped validation.
Primary workflow: BOQ normalization assumptions
Input objects: BOQ lines; Quantity units; Cost categories
Output objects: Normalized BOQ structure; Mapped cost categories; Estimate review queue
Integration targets: Construction ERP cost-code structures; Estimating and quantity surveying systems; Cost management platforms
Intelligence examples: BOQ line and unit review outline.; Cost category mapping outline.; Item structure and unit consistency signals.
Recommended next step: Discuss proposal-stage scoping
Disqualifiers: Buyers expecting a complete public source-package offer before scoped validation.; Teams needing guaranteed estimating or pricing accuracy claims or public spreadsheet upload access.

Discuss scope Intelligence examples Request review pack

Available under proposal Proposal-stage module

Tender Comparison & Award

Tender comparison and award-support workflows available for scoped procurement validation and integration discussion.

Best-fit buyer: Procurement teams validating bidder comparison and package-level evaluation workflow fit.
Not-best-fit buyer: Buyers expecting automated award decisions or guaranteed tender outcomes.
Primary workflow: Bidder comparison data model
Input objects: Bidder submissions; Package scope; Clarification notes
Output objects: Bidder comparison matrix; Package evaluation summary; Commercial scoring support notes
Integration targets: Procurement software platforms; Construction PM systems; ERP procurement modules
Intelligence examples: Bidder comparison matrix outline.; Package-level evaluation outline.; Offer normalization signals.
Recommended next step: Discuss proposal-stage scoping
Disqualifiers: Buyers expecting automated award decisions or guaranteed tender outcomes.; Teams seeking legal procurement advice, certified methodology or governance replacement.

Discuss scope Intelligence examples Request review pack

Qualification boundary

The comparison narrows fit, then email qualifies the route.

A module route still depends on buyer context, intended use, current stack, review format and timeline.

Review-ready modules are not public source access.
Proposal-stage modules are not package-completeness claims.
No public pricing, checkout, forms or CRM workflow is added.
No production deployment, legal, accounting, payment, compliance, ROI or validated ML claim is made.

Next step

Request technical review after choosing the closest route.

Send company type, module interest, workflow gap, intended use and timeline so the review can be qualified.

Request technical review View review pack

Direct line

labs@nivorqa.com

Use email for review-pack requests, module fit questions, licensing conversations and pilot scoping.