Paid pilot scoping

Scope a paid pilot without public pricing or source access.

A static buyer-qualification route for scoping one module, one workflow question and a bounded review format before any deeper commercial or source discussion.

Who should use paid pilot scoping

Buyers with a bounded evaluation question.

  • Qualified construction software, ERP, integration, project-controls or commercial-control buyers with a named workflow owner.
  • Teams that have reviewed the public module route and can define one module, one workflow question and a bounded review objective.
  • Product, engineering or commercial stakeholders who can discuss data availability, integration assumptions, timeline and NDA needs.

Who should not

Not for self-serve access or proof requests.

  • Buyers expecting public pricing, checkout, public contracts, source download, automatic access or a free sandbox.
  • No live client data, production deployment proof, customer proof or public demo portal is provided before qualification.
  • No legal/accounting/payment/compliance guarantees, ROI guarantees or validated predictive ML claims are provided.

Module selection rules

Use maturity route before pilot scope.

Review-ready modules can be scoped first. BOQ and Tender remain proposal-stage only.

Review-ready modules for qualified pilot scoping

Review-ready source-package offer

Change Order & Claims Intelligence

Commercial construction teams reviewing change-event records before internal claim-readiness decisions.

Review module route
Review-ready source-package offer

Project Risk Intelligence

Teams reviewing cost, schedule, procurement and issue signals across project-control workflows.

Review module route
Review-ready source-package offer

Subcontractor Cost Control & Margin Leakage

Commercial teams reviewing subcontract package movement, variation exposure and budget variance.

Review module route

Proposal-stage only

Available under proposal

BOQ / Cost Intelligence

Proposal-stage only. This is not presented as a current pilot-ready source-package offer.

Review proposal-stage route
Available under proposal

Tender Comparison & Award

Proposal-stage only. This is not presented as a current pilot-ready source-package offer.

Review proposal-stage route

Selection checklist

Rules before scope.

  • Start with one primary module and one buyer workflow question.
  • Project Risk Intelligence, Change Order & Claims Intelligence and Subcontractor Cost Control & Margin Leakage may be scoped as review-ready module pilots after qualification.
  • BOQ / Cost Intelligence and Tender Comparison & Award remain proposal-stage only, not current pilot-ready source-package offers.
  • Do not mix proposal-stage BOQ/Tender assumptions into a paid pilot scope until buyer data and workflow assumptions are validated.

Pilot objective examples

A useful pilot starts with a narrow question.

These examples frame evaluation work without claiming guaranteed outcomes.

Example objectives

Questions a pilot can scope.

  • Map a review-ready module to the buyer's current workflow objects and handoff points.
  • Review whether available data objects are enough for a bounded technical evaluation.
  • Test integration assumptions against an ERP, PMO, contract-control, cost-control or reporting environment.
  • Clarify review outputs, acceptance questions and no-go criteria before any deeper commercial or source discussion.
  • Identify data quality, ownership or process gaps that would block deeper review.

Buyer prerequisites

Bring the owner, context and timing.

  • Named buyer owner and workflow owner.
  • Primary module selected from the public catalogue.
  • Defined workflow gap and intended use.
  • Expected review format, timeline and NDA requirement.
  • Internal permission to discuss data shapes, integration assumptions and evaluation criteria.

Data availability expectations

Describe data shape before sharing data.

  • Representative object descriptions, field lists or buyer-approved sample structure.
  • Synthetic examples are acceptable when confidential data cannot be shared before NDA.
  • Known data gaps, inconsistent fields, access limits and quality concerns should be identified early.
  • No confidential project data should be sent through this static site.
  • Buyer remains responsible for confirming that any shared material is approved for review.
ML/data readiness review Data requirements ML readiness

Included review work

What scoping can cover.

  • Pilot boundary and module maturity-route scoping.
  • Review of input objects, output objects and integration targets from existing public module data.
  • Buyer data availability discussion.
  • Integration assumption review and handoff questions.
  • Definition of expected outputs, no-go criteria and next-step options.

Excluded work

What this route does not publish or promise.

  • No public pricing.
  • No public contract publication.
  • No checkout.
  • No forms, backend, CRM or buyer-data workflow.
  • No source download or automatic source access.
  • No production deployment, managed service or implementation commitment from the public site.
  • No legal, accounting, payment or compliance guarantee.
  • No ROI guarantee.
  • No validated predictive ML claim.

Source-review boundary

Pilot scoping does not create source access.

Source-package disclosure remains controlled and separate from this public paid pilot page.

Boundary

Keep pilot scope separate from source disclosure.

  • Paid pilot scoping does not create source access.
  • Any source-review path remains separate and controlled through qualification, agreement and NDA where appropriate.
  • Use the controlled source-review route only after module fit, buyer role, disclosure expectations and commercial path are clear.
  • Proposal-stage modules require scoped validation before any source-package discussion.

Expected outputs

Artifacts from a scoped conversation.

  • Pilot scope brief with module, workflow question, review format and timeline.
  • Data-object checklist and known data-quality questions.
  • Integration assumption notes and handoff targets.
  • Expected review outputs and buyer-side evaluation questions.
  • No-go criteria and next-step options such as no fit, technical review, proposal scoping or controlled source-review discussion.

Buyer validation responsibilities

What the buyer must validate.

  • Validate workflow fit with internal users and platform owners.
  • Confirm data availability, field meaning, permissions and quality constraints.
  • Evaluate outputs against buyer-side acceptance questions.
  • Handle internal legal, procurement, security and commercial approvals.
  • Decide whether the result supports no fit, further technical review, proposal scoping or deeper controlled discussion.

No-go criteria

Stop before scoping when these expectations are required.

The route should disqualify poor-fit expectations before any deeper review.

  • Public pricing, checkout or public contract terms are required before qualification.
  • No source download, automatic access or free sandbox access can be expected.
  • No guaranteed ROI, savings, claim recovery, margin improvement or production-readiness proof is available from this public route.
  • Legal/accounting/payment/compliance guarantees are expected.
  • No validated predictive ML accuracy claim is available from this public route.
  • BOQ or Tender must be treated as current pilot-ready source-package offers rather than proposal-stage scoping.
  • The buyer cannot name an owner, workflow gap, data expectation or evaluation question.

Email CTA

Request technical review before pilot scoping.

Share module interest, workflow gap, pilot boundary, data availability, review format, timeline and NDA requirement.

Request technical review View review pack

Direct line

labs@nivorqa.com

Use email for review-pack requests, module fit questions, licensing conversations and pilot scoping.