Architecture

Architecture outlines for qualified module review.

Use these pages to understand module structure, data assumptions, integration boundaries and source-review limits before deeper technical review.

Architecture purpose and readers

What these pages are for

Buyer-facing technical orientation.

They help technical and product buyers prepare useful diligence questions without exposing source code.

  • Public architecture pages show module purpose, data objects, logical layers, integration assumptions and review boundaries.
  • Technical review can discuss fit, data contract shape, host platform integration and buyer-side validation responsibilities.
  • Controlled source-package discussion is separate and requires qualification, commercial fit and agreement/NDA where appropriate.

Who should read them

Stakeholders mapping fit and boundaries.

  • Product, engineering, architecture, integration or technical partnership buyers comparing module fit.
  • Project-controls, commercial-control, ERP, contract-management or procurement owners preparing review questions.
  • Commercial or strategic buyers who need integration assumptions before a controlled source-package discussion.

Maturity routes

Review-ready modules and proposal-stage outlines stay separate.

Architecture pages follow the existing public module catalogue and do not create new offers.

Review-ready source-package offers

Review-ready source-package offer

Change Order & Claims Intelligence Pro

Deterministic-first change-event and claim-readiness workflows with a Claims Pro controlled-pilot AI review path for controlled technical review.

Open architecture outline
Review-ready source-package offer

Project Risk Intelligence

Auditable project risk intelligence for construction platforms, PMO teams and project-control workflows.

Open architecture outline
Review-ready source-package offer

Subcontractor Cost Control & Margin Leakage

Subcontract package tracking and margin leakage review for construction commercial teams, ERP vendors and cost-control platforms.

Open architecture outline

Available under proposal

Available under proposal

BOQ / Cost Intelligence

Proposal-stage architecture outline only. Scoped buyer validation comes before any deeper discussion.

Open proposal-stage outline
Available under proposal

Tender Comparison & Award

Proposal-stage architecture outline only. Scoped buyer validation comes before any deeper discussion.

Open proposal-stage outline

Module architecture pages

Each page maps inputs, processing, outputs and integration points.

The rows are generated from the existing five public module routes and aligned architecture profiles.

Module Public status Architecture route Primary integration assumption
Change Order & Claims Intelligence Pro Review-ready source-package offer Architecture outline Contract management platforms
Project Risk Intelligence Review-ready source-package offer Architecture outline Project controls and PMO reporting platforms
Subcontractor Cost Control & Margin Leakage Review-ready source-package offer Architecture outline Construction ERP commercial modules
BOQ / Cost Intelligence Available under proposal Proposal-stage architecture outline Construction ERP cost-code structures
Tender Comparison & Award Available under proposal Proposal-stage architecture outline Procurement software platforms

Architecture assumptions and boundaries

Integration assumptions

Host platform integration required.

  • Host platform integration required.
  • Buyer environment owns tenant/auth model, permissions, storage, UI/API adaptation and operational validation.
  • Public previews are synthetic and do not show buyer records or a buyer deployment.

Data responsibility

Buyer-side validation required.

  • Buyer validates field meaning, object identity, data quality, permitted sample structures and workflow semantics.
  • The public site has no forms, file upload, backend processing or buyer data storage.
  • Missing or sensitive data narrows the review scope and should be named before technical review.

What is not claimed

Boundaries stay explicit.

  • Architecture pages are buyer-facing outlines for module fit, data objects, integration assumptions and review boundaries.
  • They do not expose source code, source files, private repositories or implementation internals.
  • Review-ready modules can support qualified technical review; proposal-stage modules remain available under proposal.
  • Host platform integration required and buyer-side validation required.
  • No legal advice.
  • No accounting replacement.
  • No payment-processing guarantee.
  • No compliance guarantee.
  • No validated predictive ML accuracy claim.
  • No guaranteed ROI, savings, claim recovery or margin improvement.
  • No customer proof or live client data is provided on the public site.
  • No public source-code download.
  • No automatic access.
  • No free sandbox.
  • No automatic marketplace access.

Supporting pages

Use these routes to prepare deeper review.

Start from architecture, then choose data requirements, source-review model or the technical review path.

AI Approach

Deterministic-first AI strategy, Claims Pro AI scope, evaluation harness and tenant-specific ML upgrade paths.

Open page

Intelligence Layer

Deterministic workflow logic, signal extraction, ML-assisted review, explainability and governance boundaries.

Open page

ML readiness

Why ML-ready requires buyer data, labels, evaluation design and buyer-side validation.

Open page

Model governance

Human-in-the-loop review, traceable recommendations, scoring and drift/evaluation concepts.

Open page

Integration boundaries

Host platform, tenant/auth, data mapping, UI/API and security-review boundaries.

Open page

Source-package model

What source-package review means and what it does not mean.

Open page

Data requirements

Required, optional and sensitive data objects before review.

Open page

Controlled source review

Qualification and agreement path before deeper source disclosure.

Open page

Technical review

Fit check, maturity route, review-pack route and commercial path.

Open page

Next step

Use architecture to prepare the technical review.

Send module interest, buyer environment, available data objects, integration assumptions and the specific architecture question.

Request technical review Review data requirements

Direct line

labs@nivorqa.com

Use email for review-pack requests, module fit questions, licensing conversations and pilot scoping.